MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2150524741 · doi:10.2514/6.2004-3726

Numerical Transient Burning Rate Model for Solid Rocket Motor Simulations

2004· article· en· W2150524741 on OpenAlex
David R. Greatrix

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venue40th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRocket and propulsion systems research
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSolid-fuel rocketTransient (computer programming)Rocket (weapon)Transient analysisAerospace engineeringMechanicsMaterials scienceComputer scienceTransient responsePropellantPhysicsEngineeringElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

*The incorporation of time- and frequency-dependent effects on solid propellant burning behavior is important in the developing of more sophisticated solid rocket internal ballistic simulation models. A general numerical model based on the Zeldovich-Novozhilov solidphase energy conservation result for transient solid-propellant burning is presented in this study. A burning rate limiting function enables numerical stability at representative spatial and temporal increments, and with adjustment allows for an applicable alignment with observed experimental combustion response characteristics for a given propellant.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.499
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it