MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2150539462 · doi:10.1109/wcnc.2007.411

Queue-Aware Power Allocation for Space-Time Block Coded MIMO Systems

2007· article· en· W2150539462 on OpenAlexaff
Dusit Niyato, Ekram Hossain, K. C. B. Wavegedara, Vijay K. Bhargava

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Network Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceRetransmissionLink adaptationHybrid automatic repeat requestNetwork packetComputer networkMIMOQueueTransmitter power outputAutomatic repeat requestQueueing theoryQuality of serviceSpace–time block codeReal-time computingFadingQueue management systemChannel (broadcasting)Telecommunications linkTransmitter

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A queue-aware power allocation scheme for multiple-output multiple-input (MIMO) system using space time block coding (STBC) is presented. In the the physical layer, along with space-time block coded MIMO, the authors consider adaptive modulation to enhance transmission rate and error performance. To improve data reliability, automatic request (ARQ) is used for retransmission of erroneous packets from the radio link level queue. The proposed power allocation scheme is designed to minimize the cost which is defined as a function of transmit power and packet dropping probability at the radio link level queue. The genetic algorithm is used to obtain the solutions for the optimal parameters of the queue-aware power allocation scheme to minimize radio resource usage while meeting the quality-of-service (QoS) requirements for data traffic. A queueing analytical model is presented to investigate the link level performances (e.g., average queue length, packet dropping probability, throughput, and average delay) under different physical layer parameter setting.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Wireless Network OptimizationFrench-language works237,207