Biochemical Characterization and Immunocytochemical Localization of EM66, a Novel Peptide Derived from Secretogranin II, in the Rat Pituitary and Adrenal Glands
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Characterization of secretogranin II (SgII) mRNA in various vertebrates has revealed selective conservation of the amino acid sequences of two regions of the protein, i.e., the bioactive peptide secretoneurin and a flanking novel peptide that we named EM66. To help elucidate the possible role of EM66, we examined the occurrence as well as the cellular and subcellular distribution of EM66 in rat pituitary and adrenal glands by using a polyclonal antibody raised against the recombinant human EM66 peptide. High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) analysis of rat pituitary and adrenal extracts combined with a radioimmunoassay resolved EM66-immunoreactive material exhibiting the same retention time as recombinant EM66. In the rat pituitary, double-labeling immunohistochemical (IHC) studies showed that EM66 immunoreactivity (IR) was present in gonadotrophs, lactotrophs, thyrotrophs, and melanotrophs, whereas corticotrophs were devoid of labeling. EM66-IR was also observed in nerve endings in the neural lobe. Immunocytochemical staining at the electron microscopic level revealed that EM66-IR is sequestered in the secretory granules within gonadotrophs and lactotrophs. In the adrenal medulla, double IHC labeling showed that EM66-IR occurs exclusively in epinephrine-synthesizing cells. At the ultrastructural level, EM66-IR was seen in chromaffin vesicles of adrenomedullary cells. These results demonstrate that post-translational processing of SgII generates a novel peptide that exhibits a cell-specific distribution in the rat pituitary and adrenal glands where it is stored in secretory granules, supporting the notion that EM66 may play a role in the endocrine system.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".