MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2150560043 · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehu007

Autologous CD133+ bone marrow cells and bypass grafting for regeneration of ischaemic myocardium: the Cardio133 trial

2014· article· en· W2150560043 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Boris Nasseri, Wolfram Ebell, Michael Dandel, Marian Kukucka, Rolf Gebker, Adelina Doltra, Christoph Knosalla, Yeong‐Hoon Choi, Roland Hetzer, Christof Stamm

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Heart Journal · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMesenchymal stem cell research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersBundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
KeywordsMedicineEjection fractionPlaceboCardiologyInternal medicineClinical endpointCoronary artery diseaseHeart failureTransplantationMyocardial infarctionSurgeryRandomized controlled trialPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AIMS: Intra-myocardial transplantation of CD133(+) bone marrow stem cells (BMC) yielded promising results in clinical pilot trials. We now performed the double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled CARDIO133 trial to determine its impact on left ventricular (LV) function and clinical symptoms. METHODS AND RESULTS: Sixty patients with chronic ischaemic heart disease and impaired LV function (left ventricular ejection fraction, LVEF <35%) were randomized to undergo either coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and injection of CD133(+) BMC in the non-transmural, hypokinetic infarct border zone (CD133), or CABG and placebo injection (placebo). Pre-operative LVEF was 27 ± 6% in CD133 patients and 26 ± 6% in placebo patients. Outcome was assessed after 6 months, and the primary endpoint was LVEF measured by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at rest. The incidence of adverse events was similar in both groups. There was no difference in 6-min walking distance, Minnesota Living with Heart Failure score, or Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) class between groups at follow-up, and New York Heart Association class improved more in the placebo group (P = 0.004). By cardiac MRI, LVEF at 6 months was 33 ± 8% in the placebo group and 31 ± 7% in verum patients (P = 0.3), with an average inter-group difference of -2.1% (95% CI -6.3 to 2.1). Systolic or diastolic LV dimensions at 6 months were not different, either. In the CD133 group, myocardial perfusion at rest recovered in more LV segments than in the placebo group (9 vs. 2%, P < 0.001). Scar mass decreased by 2.2 ± 5 g in CD133(+) patients (P = 0.05), but was unchanged in the placebo group (0.3 ± 4 g, P = 0.7; inter-group difference in change = 2 g (95% CI -1.1 to 5)). By speckle-tracking echocardiography, cell-treated patients showed a better recovery of regional wall motion when the target area was posterior. CONCLUSION: Although there may be some improvements in scar size and regional perfusion, intra-myocardial injection of CD133(+) BMC has no effect on global LV function and clinical symptoms. Improvements in regional myocardial function are only detectable in patients with posterior infarction, probably because the interventricular septum after anterior infarction is not accessible by trans-epicardial injection. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial was registered at http://www.clinicaltrials.gov under NCT00462774.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.679
Threshold uncertainty score0.359

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations126
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Heart JournalSame topicMesenchymal stem cell researchFrench-language works237,207