Bibliographic record
Abstract
Lupus (2007) 16, 925‐928 http://lup.sagepub.com Since the first description of the bimodal mortality pattern of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) showing that coronary artery disease (CAD) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in this condition, multiple studies have addressed the nature of these clinical outcomes and the associated risk factors. However, their exact incidence and prevalence is unknown and the relevant risk factors have not been fully elucidated. A few studies have attempted to identify risk factors for CAD in lupus. 1‐4 Most compared patients with SLE and documented CAD to those with no CAD, addressing classic cardiac risk factors. To date, these studies have found elevated total cholesterol and older age at diagnosis of SLE to be significantly associated with CAD. Other factors implicated in one or two studies have been hypertension, 2,3 previous cardiac involvement with SLE, 3 obesity 2 and longer duration of corticosteroid use. 1 However, lupus populations vary with regard to organ involvement and given the limited power of previous studies, it has not been possible to adequately address these variables in the past.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".