MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2150608253 · doi:10.1002/ibd.20123

C-Reactive Protein: Informative or Misleading Marker of Crohnʼs Disease?

2007· letter· en· W2150608253 on OpenAlexaff
Denis Franchimont

Bibliographic record

VenueInflammatory Bowel Diseases · 2007
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInflammatory Bowel Disease
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCrohn's diseaseMedicineC-reactive proteinDiseaseCrohn diseaseImmunologyPathologyInflammation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In a recent study, the Radford-Smith group addressed the important question of whether it was possible to identify and characterize patients with normal or low serum C-reactive protein (CRP) levels in a prospective cohort of patients with active Crohn's disease (as per the criteria of the Crohn's Disease Activity Index [CDAI]).1 Florin et al compared patients with active CD who had low CRP levels with those who had high CRP levels and found significantly more ileal localization, less pure colonic localization, and lower body mass index (BMI) in the low-CRP group. The 2 groups showed no significant differences in age at diagnosis, smoking status, rate of appendectomy, duration of disease, number of relapses, disease behaviors, or extra-intestinal manifestations. Prior to inclusion in the study, the patients in the low-CRP group had undergone CD abdominal surgical procedures significantly more often than had those in the high-CRP group because of the high frequency of ileal involvement in the low-CRP group. Because NOD2 mutations are more often associated with CD patients with ileal disease, this study examined NOD2 variants but found no significant differences in their allelic frequency between the 2 groups. Thus, patients with active disease (as per CDAI criteria) and low serum CRP would be patients with pure ileal disease. Onset or relapse of Crohn's disease is often associated with diarrhea and abdominal pain and sometimes with fatigue, fever, and weight loss. However, these symptoms may be misleading as they can also reflect a concomitant disease. Thus, efforts must be made to exclude other causes of these symptoms such as gastroenteritis, irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), bacterial overgrowth, bile salt wastage, secondary lactase deficiency, short bowel syndrome, and medication-induced diarrhea.2 Although only a small number of patients with active disease go into remission without specific treatment, recent double-blind controlled trials of patients with moderately active Crohn's disease clearly demonstrated that a third of patients will go into remission on placebo.3 Indeed, the CDAI, widely used in most clinical trials, is mostly based on a grading score of various symptoms and thus has a large subjective component. Therefore, measuring the severity of disease and the subsequent treatment response/remission solely on the basis of symptoms is misleading as it does not always reflect the magnitude of inflammation because of interfering concomitant factors or disease. The resurgence of interest in C-reactive protein, a major liver-derived acute-phase protein, has provided a better definition of disease flare-up.4 When abscess formation or infections are ruled out, the level of serum CRP acts as a robust marker of intestinal inflammation and as an excellent biological marker of response for patients with elevated CRP and active luminal disease. The therapeutic action of some of the newer biologics is indeed more striking on stratification of treatment response according to serum CRP level.5,6 Importantly, this more objective and scientific parameter of disease activity decreases the placebo response in clinical trials. The high placebo response and modest therapeutic effect of new biologics in CD patients with a low CRP level led many investigators to consider these patients as having overlapping IBS, thereby falsely increasing their CDAI scores. Thus, an important task is to be able to differentiate among low-CRP CD patients, those patients with a true CD flare-up from those having overlapping IBS symptoms. In truth, there must be a subset of patients with low serum CRP who have active disease and intestinal inflammation that does not translate into increased serum CRP levels. Interestingly, this study suggests that patients with ileal disease tend to develop a more loco-regional inflammatory disease (as evidenced by the high rate of fat wrapping in the low-CRP group of patients who had ileal resection) than a systemic disease. It is unlikely that ileal disease would be associated with specific CRP promoter or gene polymorphisms affecting serum CRP level.7 Therefore, ileal disease may not trigger a liver-mediated acute-phase response and subsequent cytokine-induced release of CRP. It has long been recognized that colonic disease is more frequently associated with an inflammatory phenotype, a chronic active disease profile, and steroid dependence. These patients also have an improved response rate to immunosuppressants and new biologics. Indeed, the best predictive factors for response to infliximab are high CRP level, colonic disease, and treatment with immunosuppressants.8,9 An important message of this study is to consider that CD patients may have active disease with normal or low CRP levels if they suffer from a pure ileal disease. Thus, a new stratification of disease phenotype based on serum CRP level during active disease may affect therapeutic decision plans when considering current and novel therapies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.014
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.014
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0120.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInflammatory Bowel DiseasesSame topicInflammatory Bowel DiseaseFrench-language works237,207