Bibliographic record
Abstract
La neuropsychologie au Quebec est issue d'une tradition nord-americaine, mais elle entretient, depuis les annees 1980, des liens etroits avec la neuropsychologie europeenne. La neuropsychologie quebecoise est nee des travaux inauguraux des Drs Wilder Penfield et Brenda Milner a l'Institut neurologique de Montreal. La neuropsychologie s'est ensuite developpee dans les annees 1970 et 1980, notamment sous l'influence du Dr Andre Roch Lecours, lequel contribua a l'essor de l'aphasiologie et de la neuropsychologie cognitive et fonda, au debut des annees 1980, le Centre de recherche Cote-des-Neiges (aujourd'hui le CRIUGM). Depuis sa creation, ce centre a ete et continue a etre le lieu de nombreux echanges entre chercheurs et cliniciens quebecois et europeens. Actuellement, plusieurs groupes de recherche contribuent au developpement de la neuropsychologie et des neurosciences cognitives au Quebec. De plus, plusieurs centres de neuro-imagerie au Quebec ont permis des avancees importantes au niveau de notre comprehension des relations cerveau-comportement. Enfin, la neuropsychologie clinique a connu un essor important au Quebec, qui s'est exprime notamment par le developpement d'une formation de doctorat en neuropsychologie clinique.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".