MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2150747885 · doi:10.1785/0120100010

Microseismic Noise from Large Ice-Covered Lakes?

2012· article· en· W2150747885 on OpenAlexaffabout
Yu Jeffrey Gu, Luyi Shen

Bibliographic record

VenueBulletin of the Seismological Society of America · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicSeismic Waves and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNational Science Council
KeywordsMicroseismGeologySeismologyNoise (video)OceanographyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study examines the background seismic noise in the southern Western Canadian Sedimentary Basin (WCSB) using broadband seismic records from Canadian Rockies and Alberta Network (CRANE) and Canadian National Seismograph Network (CNSN). The cross‐correlations of vertical‐component data reveal highly asymmetric Rayleigh wave signals in the frequency range of 0.02–0.2 Hz. Travel‐time and waveform source migration calculations jointly suggest a persistent noise source near Lesser Slave Lake (LSL), a large ice‐covered lake in Alberta, Canada, during winter months. The source origin remains unclear, though the gravity current and turbulence induced by laterally varying luminosity, ice thickness, lake depth, and lake‐bottom topography could contribute to the observed microseismic signal. Seasonal variations in regional wind energy, ground attenuation, and local industrial and/or recreational activities may also affect the clarity and asymmetry of noise‐correlation functions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.285
Threshold uncertainty score0.566

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaSame topicSeismic Waves and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207