MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2150764230 · doi:10.33137/rr.v41i4.9056

James VI, Prince Henry, and <i>A True Reportarie</i> of Baptism at Stirling 1594

2005· article· fr· W2150764230 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Rick Bowers

Bibliographic record

VenueRenaissance and Reformation · 2005
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Art and Culture Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtArt historyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Traditionnellement, le baptême d’un premier né royal — en particulier un fils — donne lieu à bien des célébrations et festivités à caractère politique. En 1594, Jacques VI d’Écosse a élevé le baptême de son fils à un degré surprenant d’art politique à travers le medium imprimé. Pourtant, malgré qu’il ait été publié simultanément à Londres et Édimbourg, A True Reportarie décrivant le baptême du prince Henri dans la nouvelle chapelle royale de Stirling Castle est resté largement ignoré par les critiques et les historiens; cela, sans doute en raison de l’anglocentrisme qui a marqué l’époque des Stuart à partir de 1603, lorsque Jacques est monté sur le trône anglais. La relation du baptême de Henri en 1594 documente, par ailleurs, par voie d’annonce et de performance, l’agenda politique radicalement optimiste de Jacques VI. À travers les thématiques de prouesse royale et de programme dynastique, A True Reportarie (1594) constitue une nouvelle forme d’annonce politique, le communiqué Protestant réformé, en rupture avec le passé catholique, qui met en équilibre le nationalisme écossais et l’union britannique, et exprime les complexités culturelles à venir du règne de Jacques.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.855
Threshold uncertainty score0.868

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRenaissance and ReformationSame topicHistorical Art and Culture StudiesFrench-language works237,207