A flexible resource allocation and scheduling framework for non-real-time polling service in IEEE 802.16 networks
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper proposes an efficient yet simple design framework for achieving flexible resource allocation and packet scheduling for non-real-time polling service (nrtPS) traffic in IEEE 802.16 networks. By jointly considering the selective automatic repeat request mechanism at the media access control layer as well as the adaptive modulation and coding technique at the physical layer, the proposed framework enables a graceful tradeoff between resource utilization and packet delivery delay while maintaining the minimum throughput requirements of nrtPS applications. An analytical model is developed for parameter manipulation in the proposed framework, where some important performance metrics, such as inter-service time, delivery delay, goodput, and resource utilization, are investigated for performance evaluation. Simulation results are given to demonstrate the efficiency of the proposed framework and verify the accuracy of the analytical model.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it