A New Approach to Subquadratic Space Complexity Parallel Multipliers for Extended Binary Fields
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Based on Toeplitz matrix-vector products and coordinate transformation techniques, we present a new scheme for subquadratic space complexity parallel multiplication in GF(2n) using the shifted polynomial basis. Both the space complexity and the asymptotic gate delay of the proposed multiplier are better than those of the best existing subquadratic space complexity parallel multipliers. For example, with n being a power of 2, the space complexity is about 8 percent better, while the asymptotic gate delay is about 33 percent better, respectively. Another advantage of the proposed matrix-vector product approach is that it can also be used to design subquadratic space complexity polynomial, dual, weakly dual, and triangular basis parallel multipliers. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time that subquadratic space complexity parallel multipliers are proposed for dual, weakly dual, and triangular bases. A recursive design algorithm is also proposed for efficient construction of the proposed subquadratic space complexity multipliers. This design algorithm can be modified for the construction of most of the subquadratic space complexity multipliers previously reported in the literature
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".