Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article traite du lien qui existe entre les habitudes alimentaires et les discours normatifs sur l’alimentation. La notion d’équilibre est le point central autour duquel s’organise l’opposition entre plaisir et contrôle. Les conclusions tirées de cet article proviennent d’une série d’entretiens menés auprès d’individus qui font de l’entraînement physique sur une base régulière. Pour eux, l’équilibre s’obtient par les pratiques alimentaires, mais surtout par la mise en oeuvre du dosage entre plaisir et contrôle. Selon l’auteur, le lien social est la pierre angulaire de cet équilibre et son analyse l’amène à postuler qu’une propension forte au contrôle semble déranger le fonctionnement relationnel, exposant ainsi le mangeur à l’isolement et à la stigmatisation. C’est dans cet horizon que se dessine la frontière entre le normal et le pathologique.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.013 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".