MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2150800550 · doi:10.1002/adv.20170

Effect of initiator type and concentration on polymerization rate and molecular weight in the bimolecular nitroxide‐mediated radical polymerization of styrene

2010· article· en· W2150800550 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvances in Polymer Technology · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAdvanced Polymer Synthesis and Characterization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNitroxide mediated radical polymerizationPolymerizationPolymer chemistryStyreneRadical polymerizationMaterials scienceLiving free-radical polymerizationReversible addition−fragmentation chain-transfer polymerizationBenzoyl peroxideCopolymerPolymerComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract To increase the polymerization rate in the bimolecular nitroxide‐mediated radical polymerization (NMRP) of styrene, without using expensive non‐commercial reagents, an experimental study using 2,2,6,6‐tetramethyl‐1‐piperidinoxyl as a controller and tert‐butylperoxy 2‐ethylhexyl carbonate (TBEC) as the initiator was carried out. The basis for comparison was the bimolecular NMRP of styrene with dibenzoyl peroxide as initiator. It was found that faster polymerization rates and still relatively low polydispersities were possible using TBEC. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Adv Polym Techn 29:11–19, 2010; Published online in Wiley InterScience ( www.interscience.wiley.com ). DOI 10.1002/adv.20170

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.060
Threshold uncertainty score0.673

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.002
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it