MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2150803389 · doi:10.1029/2006gb002825

Rapid decline of the CO<sub>2</sub> buffering capacity in the North Sea and implications for the North Atlantic Ocean

2007· article· en· W2150803389 on OpenAlexaff
Helmuth Thomas, A. E. Friederike Prowe, Steven van Heuven, Yann Bozec, H. J. W. de Baar, Laure‐Sophie Schiettecatte, K. Suykens, Mathieu Koné, Alberto Borges, Ivan D. Lima, Scott C. Doney

Bibliographic record

VenueGlobal Biogeochemical Cycles · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMarine and coastal ecosystems
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersOffice of Naval ResearchEuropean CommissionNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationNational Science Foundation
KeywordsOceanographyMiddle latitudesWater columnNorth Atlantic oscillationEnvironmental scienceCarbonateSurface waterSeawaterDissolved organic carbonNorth Atlantic Deep WaterSea surface temperatureClimatologyGeologyThermohaline circulationChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

New observations from the North Sea, a NW European shelf sea, show that between 2001 and 2005 the CO 2 partial pressure ( p CO 2 ) in surface waters rose by 22 μ atm, thus faster than atmospheric p CO 2 , which in the same period rose approximately 11 μ atm. The surprisingly rapid decline in air‐sea partial pressure difference (Δ p CO 2 ) is primarily a response to an elevated water column inventory of dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC), which, in turn, reflects mostly anthropogenic CO 2 input rather than natural interannual variability. The resulting decline in the buffering capacity of the inorganic carbonate system (increasing Revelle factor) sets up a theoretically predicted feedback loop whereby the invasion of anthropogenic CO 2 reduces the ocean's ability to uptake additional CO 2 . Model simulations for the North Atlantic Ocean and thermodynamic principles reveal that this feedback should be stronger, at present, in colder midlatitude and subpolar waters because of the lower present‐day buffer capacity and elevated DIC levels driven either by northward advected surface water and/or excess local air‐sea CO 2 uptake. This buffer capacity feedback mechanism helps to explain at least part of the observed trend of decreasing air‐sea Δ p CO 2 over time as reported in several other recent North Atlantic studies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.126
Threshold uncertainty score0.993

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations115
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGlobal Biogeochemical CyclesSame topicMarine and coastal ecosystemsFrench-language works237,207