MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2150805052 · doi:10.1109/epec.2013.6802923

Application of PSO and fuzzy logic for underfrequency load shedding

2013· article· en· W2150805052 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIslanding Detection in Power Systems
Canadian institutionsOntario Tech University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsParticle swarm optimizationFuzzy logicLoad SheddingEconomic shortageElectric power systemComputer scienceControl theory (sociology)Fuzzy control systemMathematical optimizationControl engineeringPower (physics)EngineeringMathematicsControl (management)Artificial intelligenceAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Islanded operation of power systems with a shortage of generation to meet the local demand may experience a dip in frequency which could potentially damage the system equipment unless proper action is taken to shed loads in a timely manner. Recent research has shown that the uncertainty associated with estimating the amount of load to be shed can be better handled by fuzzy systems; however, there is not much work on determining the optimal settings of the fuzzy system parameters. This paper presents the application of Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) in optimization of a fuzzy system used in underfrequency load shedding (UFLS).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.968
Threshold uncertainty score0.209

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIslanding Detection in Power SystemsFrench-language works237,207