MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The Transformative Potential of Learning Through Service While “Doing” Classroom-Based Research

2014· article· en· W2150821037 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicService-Learning and Community Engagement
Canadian institutionsBrock University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsService-learningPsychologyExperiential learningTransformative learningFeelingPedagogyHumanitiesSociologySocial psychologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Experiential education and service-learning are “buzz words” within many educational circles. The purpose of this study was to explore students’ (N=18) and professor experiences with/in a student-directed experiential education elective course, with a particular focus on a service-learning initiative. Stephen Brookfield’s critical incident questionnaire (1995) and transformative phenomenology served as the guiding frameworks for this study. The results yielded four themes, including: 1) Sense of accomplishment, 2) Feelings of frustration, 3) Questioning student-directed course experience, and 4) Experiences from self-study participation. This study serves to further confirm that engaging in service-learning projects within a student-directed course can lead to a strong sense of accomplishment despite feelings of frustration and resistance. L’apprentissage par l’expérience et l’apprentissage par le service sont des expressions au goût du jour dans de nombreux milieux éducatifs. L’objectif de cette étude était d’explorer les expériences des professeurs et des étudiants dans un cours facultatif axé sur l’apprentissage par l’expérience dirigé par les étudiants, dont l’accent portait sur les initiatives d’apprentissage par le service. Le questionnaire de Stephen Brookfield sur les incidents critiques (1995) ainsi que la phénoménologie transformatrice ont servi de cadres conceptuels pour cette étude. Les résultats ont mené aux quatre thèmes suivants : 1) sens d’accomplissement, 2) sens de frustration, 3) questionnement sur l’expérience d’un cours dirigé par les étudiants, et 4) expérience dérivée de la participation à l’auto-formation. Cette étude confirme de nouveau que le fait de s’engager dans des projets d’auto-formation dans un cours dirigé par les étudiants peut aboutir à un sens profond d’accomplissement, malgré certains sentiments de frustration et de résistance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.061
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Science and technology studies, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.628
Threshold uncertainty score0.994

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0610.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0410.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.123
GPT teacher head0.373
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it