Evaluation of Pancreatic Amylase mRNA upon Cholinergic Stimulation of Secretion
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The primary function of the exocrine pancreas consists of the synthesis and secretion of several digestive enzymes. It is well established that amylase secretion by rat pancreatic tissue or by isolated acinar cells in culture can be stimulated by the cholinergic agonist carbachol. However, the effect of this secretagogue on enzyme synthesis remains unclear. Some studies demonstrated increases in rates of synthesis, whereas others reported increases in secretion with or without decreases in synthesis. We have evaluated changes in pancreatic amylase mRNA and total RNA after a single injection of carbachol and under fasting conditions. Two approaches in molecular morphology were applied on rat pancreatic tissue: in situ hybridization and RNase A-gold. Both revealed decreases in RNA labeling at the level of the rough endoplasmic reticulum (RER) 5 min after stimulation of secretion and after fasting. Gradual recovery was registered 15 and 30 min after stimulation of secretion. Northern blotting confirmed drastic decreases in amylase mRNA 5 min after stimulation and after fasting. The combination of such different approaches has demonstrated drastic decreases in RNA at the RER level, reflecting declines in rates of synthesis at the translational level under all conditions tested.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".