MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2150842948 · doi:10.1109/pesw.2002.985098

Multi-terminal HVDC as enabling technology of premium quality power park

2003· article· en· W2150842948 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venue2002 IEEE Power Engineering Society Winter Meeting. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.02CH37309) · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower Quality and Harmonics
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTerminal (telecommunication)ConvertersElectrical engineeringElectric power systemTransmission systemVoltage sourcePower (physics)High-voltage direct currentPower qualityInsulated-gate bipolar transistorEngineeringTransmission (telecommunications)VoltageComputer scienceTelecommunicationsDirect currentPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Subtransmission and distribution systems in large cities are often served by underground cable systems. Because of the compactness and the reduced cost of DC cable transmission lines, a multi-terminal HVDC system based on IGBT voltage source converters (VSCs) can be an attractive alternative to an AC cable system. This paper draws attention to the added value which comes from the capability of multi-terminal HVDC (VSC-M-HVDC) system to ensure uninterrupted quality power to sensitive loads. The value of premium quality power park obtainable from a VSC-M-HVDC system should enhance its attractiveness.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.315
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it