MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2150875398 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2008.4564745

Light controlled oscillators; pixel architecture for large area linear digital imaging using amorphous silicon

2008· article· en· W2150875398 on OpenAlex
Farhad Taghibakhsh, Karim S. Karim

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueConference proceedings - Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicThin-Film Transistor Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThin-film transistorMaterials scienceRing oscillatorOptoelectronicsAmorphous siliconTransistorBiasingDetectorSiliconElectronic circuitLogic gateSensitivity (control systems)VoltageElectrical engineeringOpticsElectronic engineeringEngineeringPhysicsCMOSCrystalline siliconNanotechnologyLayer (electronics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The theory of operation and experimental results of a light controlled thin film transistor (TFT) oscillator circuits in amorphous silicon (a-Si) technology are presented. The circuit consists of a three-stage ring oscillator made of a top-gate TFT as driver and a photoconductor detector as the load for each stage, all fabricated in-house using a four mask top-gate process. Measurements indicate linear operation of the circuit up to 160 kHz output frequency with a sensitivity of 13.8 kHz/muW optical power at a biasing voltage of 25 V.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.899
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.181
Teacher spread0.169 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it