Entre la récupération des savoirs critiques et la construction des standards du management libéral
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article montre que l’étude des rapports entre science et politique, dans le domaine de l’éducation, rencontre des débats importants, notamment en ce qui concerne le statut de la pédagogie, le lien entre théories et pratiques, la capacité du système à répondre de manière opérationnelle aux questions des enseignants et des acteurs politiques, le compromis réalisé à chaque niveau en matière d’égalité des chances, etc. L’article mentionne également que la régulation de chaque système éducatif local repose sur des objectifs mesurables et des comparaisons internationales en vue de définir les niveaux de performance. Il questionne la place des programmes centrés sur les compétences. Il souligne enfin le rôle des décisions politiques dans l’inégalité de trajectoires entre la formation des élites et celle de la masse.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.022 | 0.030 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.047 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.013 | 0.012 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.006 | 0.009 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".