MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2150888653 · doi:10.1086/444426

Virus Attachment and Replication Are Promoted after Acquisition of Host CD28 and CD152 by HIV‐1

2005· article· en· W2150888653 on OpenAlexafffund
Jean‐François Giguère, Juliette Diou, Joaquim Madrenas, Michel J. Tremblay

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Infectious Diseases · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicHIV Research and Treatment
Canadian institutionsWestern UniversityUniversité Laval
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchFaculté de Médecine, Université LavalUniversité LavalStyrelsen för Internationellt Utvecklingssamarbete
KeywordsCD86CD80CD28Jurkat cellsInfectivityVirologyVirusBiologyImmunologyT cellImmune systemCD40Cytotoxic T cellIn vitroGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

CD28 is constitutively expressed on CD4(+) cells, but its homologue CD152 is only weakly expressed after cell activation. To determine whether these 2 costimulatory molecules can be inserted into human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1), virus was produced in CD28- and CD152-expressing Jurkat-derived cells. Both molecules were efficiently acquired by virions. Virus attachment and infectivity were more affected by CD152 than by CD28. Given that CD28/CD152-CD80/CD86 interactions play a dominant role in antigen presentation, it can thus be proposed that the association between virus-anchored host CD28/CD152 and cell-surface CD80/CD86 on target cells might have consequences for the transmission and pathogenesis of HIV-1.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Infectious DiseasesSame topicHIV Research and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207