MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Lightweight Shotcrete Canoe: Use of Viscosity Modifying Admixture and Acetone as Artificial Paste

2006· article· en· W2150891098 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Maxim Morency, François Paradis

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Materials in Civil Engineering · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicInnovations in Concrete and Construction Materials
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
FundersUniversité Laval
KeywordsShotcreteViscosityUltimate tensile strengthMaterials scienceMoldAcetoneGeotechnical engineeringComposite materialCivil engineeringEngineeringChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents some of the most interesting steps followed by the Canadian team from Laval University in developing a high tensile strength, lightweight concrete for the construction of their canoe. This mixture was used in 2004 by the Laval University Concrete Canoe Team, which, year after year, participates in an engineering challenge. The objective is to develop a concrete mixture that can be pumped and shot on a male mold using a custom shotcrete technique. The 2004 mix contains acetone to enhance its fluidity and Welan gum to increase its viscosity, thus preventing segregation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.064
Threshold uncertainty score0.786

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2006
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Materials in Civil EngineeringSame topicInnovations in Concrete and Construction MaterialsFrench-language works237,207