MUTEC: Mutation-based testing of Cross Site Scripting
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cross Site Scripting (XSS) is one of the worst vulnerabilities that allow malicious attacks such as cookie thefts and Web page defacements. Testing an implementation against XSS vulnerabilities (XSSVs) can avoid these consequences. Obtaining an adequate test data set is essential for testing of XSSVs. An adequate test data set contains effective test cases that can reveal XSSVs. Unfortunately, traditional testing techniques for XSSVs do not address the issue of adequate testing. In this work, we apply the idea of mutation-based testing technique to generate adequate test data sets for testing XSSVs. Our work addresses XSSVs related to Web-applications that use PHP and JavaScript code to generate dynamic HTML contents. We propose 11 mutation operators to force the generation of adequate test data set. A prototype mutation-based testing tool named MUTEC is developed to generate mutants automatically. The proposed operators are validated by using five open source applications having XSSVs. The results indicate that the proposed operators are effective for testing XSSVs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it