MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Thermodynamic Evaluation and Optimization of the <scp> Al <sub>2</sub> O <sub>3</sub> –SiO <sub>2</sub> –AlF <sub>3</sub> –SiF <sub>4</sub> </scp> Reciprocal System Using the Modified Quasichemical Model

2011· article· en· W2150917935 on OpenAlexaff
Guillaume Lambotte, Patrice Chartrand

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Ceramic Society · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMetallurgical Processes and Thermodynamics
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhase diagramThermodynamicsTopazMulliteReciprocalTernary operationSolid solutionPhase (matter)Ternary numeral systemBar (unit)Materials scienceChemistryMineralogyPhysicsMetallurgyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

All available thermodynamic and phase diagram data for the ternary reciprocal system Al 2 O 3 –SiO 2 –AlF 3 –SiF 4 have been critically reviewed. The oxyfluoride liquid solution was modeled using the M odified Q uasichemical M odel in the Q uadruplet A pproximation and the most reliable data have been used to optimize the model parameters. The mullite solid solution was previously modeled using the C ompound E nergy F ormalism. Data for fluor‐topaz have been critically reviewed and a new thermodynamic description has been obtained. Phase equilibrium with the gas phase in the reciprocal system at 1 bar is reproduced.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.275
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Ceramic SocietySame topicMetallurgical Processes and ThermodynamicsFrench-language works237,207