MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2150924989 · doi:10.1098/rspa.2001.0916

A normal form for nonlinear resonance of embedded solitons

2002· article· en· W2150924989 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNonlinear Photonic Systems
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSolitonPhysicsNonlinear systemHamiltonian (control theory)CodimensionAmplitudeBifurcationHamiltonian systemNonlinear resonanceResonance (particle physics)Sign (mathematics)Continuous spectrumQuantum electrodynamicsClassical mechanicsQuantum mechanicsMathematical analysisMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A normal form for nonlinear resonance of embedded solitons is derived for a coupled two–wave system that generalizes the second–harmonic–generating model. This wave system is non–Hamiltonian in general. An embedded soliton is a localized mode of the nonlinear system that coexists with the linear wave spectrum. It occurs as a result of a codimension–one bifurcation of non–local wave solutions. Nonlinearity couples the embedded soliton and the linear wave spectrum and induces a one–sided radiation–driven decay of embedded solitons. The normal form shows that the embedded soliton is semi–stable, i.e. it survives under perturbations of one sign, but is destroyed by perturbations of the opposite sign. When a perturbed embedded soliton sheds continuous wave radiation, the radiation amplitude is generally not minimal, even if the wave system is Hamiltonian. The results of the analytical theory are confirmed by numerical computations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.966
Threshold uncertainty score0.279

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it