MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2150924989 · doi:10.1098/rspa.2001.0916

A normal form for nonlinear resonance of embedded solitons

2002· article· en· W2150924989 on OpenAlexaff
Dmitry E. Pelinovsky, Jianke Yang

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNonlinear Photonic Systems
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSolitonPhysicsNonlinear systemHamiltonian (control theory)CodimensionAmplitudeBifurcationHamiltonian systemNonlinear resonanceResonance (particle physics)Sign (mathematics)Continuous spectrumQuantum electrodynamicsClassical mechanicsQuantum mechanicsMathematical analysisMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A normal form for nonlinear resonance of embedded solitons is derived for a coupled two–wave system that generalizes the second–harmonic–generating model. This wave system is non–Hamiltonian in general. An embedded soliton is a localized mode of the nonlinear system that coexists with the linear wave spectrum. It occurs as a result of a codimension–one bifurcation of non–local wave solutions. Nonlinearity couples the embedded soliton and the linear wave spectrum and induces a one–sided radiation–driven decay of embedded solitons. The normal form shows that the embedded soliton is semi–stable, i.e. it survives under perturbations of one sign, but is destroyed by perturbations of the opposite sign. When a perturbed embedded soliton sheds continuous wave radiation, the radiation amplitude is generally not minimal, even if the wave system is Hamiltonian. The results of the analytical theory are confirmed by numerical computations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.030

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.004
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations34
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering SciencesSame topicNonlinear Photonic SystemsFrench-language works237,207