MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2150936244 · doi:10.1109/glocom.2004.1379037

TPSF+: a new two-phase scatternet formation algorithm for bluetooth ad hoc networks

2005· article· en· W2150936244 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicBluetooth and Wireless Communication Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScatternetComputer networkComputer scienceBluetoothNetwork packetWireless ad hoc networkNode (physics)ThroughputMobile ad hoc networkTransmission (telecommunications)Distributed computingWirelessTelecommunicationsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A Bluetooth scatternet can be formed by interconnecting two or more piconets together. To reduce the traffic load of master and bridge nodes, a two-phase scatternet formation (TPSF) algorithm was proposed (Kawamoto, Y. et al., Proc. IEEE WCNC '03, 2003). A control scatternet is created for the transmission of control packets. For each source and destination pair, an on-demand scatternet is created for the transmission of data packets. The original TPSF does not consider the support of node mobility. We propose TPSF+, which is an extension of the on-demand scatternet formation in the original TPSF. In TPSF+, route information is discovered when a communication session is required between the two nodes. Simulation results show that TPSF+ has a higher successful path connection ratio when compare with the original TPSF. The proposed TPSF+ also has a higher aggregate throughput and smaller end-to-end delay when compared with BTCP (Salonidis, T. et al., Proc. IEEE INFOCOM'01, 2001) and Bluenet (Wang, Z. et al., Proc. 35th Hawaii Int. Conf. on System Sciences - HICSS-35, 2002).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.960
Threshold uncertainty score0.620

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it