The effect of palmitic acid on lipoprotein cholesterol levels
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The present study assessed the effect of high versus low palmitic acid intakes of plasma lipoprotein cholesterol levels and on rates for endogenous synthesis of cholesterol in normal and hypercholesterolemic subjects. On day 21 of each diet treatment, a fasting blood sample was drawn for lipoprotein determination and to provide a measure of the background level of deuterium. A priming dose of deuterium was consumed and a second blood sample obtained 24 hours after the first sample. Isotope ratio mass spectrometry was used to determine the incorporation of deuterium into the newly synthesized cholesterol molecule and fractional synthetic rates were calculated. Four diets were formulated to provide combinations of two levels of 16:0 at two levels of 18:2n-6. Subjects received each of the four diet treatments for 21 days, followed by washout periods of 21 days. Serum total cholesterol and LDL-cholesterol was not significantly affected by the high level of 16:0 when diets also contained a high level of 18:2n-6. Fractional synthesis rates of cholesterol observed for each diet treatment did not differ significantly, suggesting no relationship between the endogenous synthesis of cholesterol and dietary 16:0 content. The results indicate that 16:0 has no effect on serum lipoprotein profiles in the presence of recommended intakes for 18:2n-6.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".