Long‐term survival rate of pediatric patients after blood transfusion
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Studies in adults report posttransfusion survival rate (PTSR) at 1 to 10 years of 41 to 67 percent. There are no published studies specifically addressing PTSR in pediatric patients. The objectives of this study were to evaluate PTSR and risk factors associated with death in children receiving transfusions. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A database of all patients receiving their first transfusion between 1990 and 1992 at Sainte-Justine Hospital (SJH) was used. Patients' demographic data, primary diagnosis, surgical procedures, and information on all labile components transfused were collected. Death was confirmed by the SJH database, RAMQ (universal health care provider for Québec residents), and the Quebec Commission for Access to Information (death certificate). RESULTS: The study population consisted of 1100 children. Median age was 16 months (range, 0-204 months). The most frequent primary diagnoses were cardiac disease (22%), prematurity (21.5%), malignant disease (11%), and hematologic disease (9.5%). Patients received a median of three transfusions (range, 1-126). PTSR was 86.9 percent at 1 year and 82.3 percent at 10 years. For nonsurvivors, median survival time was 22 days. Multivariate analysis showed that significant risk factors for death are age of less than 1 month, a diagnosis of malignant disease, more than 20 transfusions, and administration of more than one type of blood component. CONCLUSION: PTSR in children receiving their first transfusion between 1990 and 1992 was considerably higher than the PTSR reported in adults. Death occurred early after the first transfusion; survival rate remained relatively stable thereafter.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".