Surface‐relief diffraction gratings' optimization for plasmonic enhancements in thin‐film solar cells
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Methodical and intensive surface plasmon (SP) excitation trials were carried out on various dielectric‐metal interfaces to optimize plasmonic photocurrent enhancements in organic P3HT‐PCBM photovoltaic thin films. The SPs were optically excited via the diffraction grating method using single, crossed, and parallel grating schemes, with trials yielding optimal grating and film thickness parameters. Photocurrent enhancements up to 355% were demonstrated with TM‐polarized incident light on single and parallel grating structures, while both TM and TE‐polarized incident light enhancements were present on crossed grating structures. When compared with the photocurrent enhancements seen on single gratings, those seen on parallel gratings were comparable in magnitude but were shown over a broader optical band. This broadening of the optical band was due to the simultaneous SP excitations by the two superimposed gratings in the parallel scheme. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".