MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2151019038 · doi:10.1109/glsv.1994.289978

Mapping tensor products onto VLSI networks with reduced I/O

2002· article· en· W2151019038 on OpenAlexaff
A. Elnaggar, Hussein Alnuweiri, M.R. Ito

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDigital Filter Design and Implementation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVery-large-scale integrationComputer scienceChipComputationTensor productSignal processingTensor (intrinsic definition)Parallel computingDigital signal processingComputer architectureComputer hardwareEmbedded systemMathematicsAlgorithmTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a methodology for designing folded VLSI networks for implementing tensor-product forms. Using tensor-products leads to very efficient expressions for a large number of computations in digital signal processing and matrix arithmetic. The resulting networks can trade-off total time delay with I/O bandwidth and chip area. The main goal is to parametrize the VLSI architecture so that it can be implemented under various packaging constraints including the available number of I/O pins, available chip-area, and certain restrictions on maximum wire length. Our methods result in folded VLSI networks with optimal AT/sup 2/ trade-off for digital filtering and multidimensional transforms, where A is the total area of the VLSI circuit (or chip) and T is its total time delay.>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicDigital Filter Design and ImplementationFrench-language works237,207