MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2151032445 · doi:10.1109/pacrim.2005.1517263

A CBR-streaming scheme for VBR-encoded videos

2005· article· en· W2151032445 on OpenAlexaff
Md. Humayun Kabir, Eric G. Manning, Gholamali C. Shoja

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage and Video Quality Assessment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceVariable bitrateConstant bitrateJitterReal-time computingComputer networkLatency (audio)CacheEncoding (memory)Proxy (statistics)Quality of serviceTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Media files are required to use variable-bit-rate (VBR) encoding, such as MPEG-2, in order to get constant quality compressed video. However, it produces traffic burst, which makes streaming complicated. Large network latency and jitter cause long start-up delay and frequent unwanted pauses in media playback, respectively. In this paper, we have proposed a proxy based constant-bit-rate (CBR) streaming scheme that allows a server to transmit a VBR-encoded video at a fixed rate, close to its mean encoding bit rate, and deals with the network latency and jitter issues efficiently without caching an entire media file. We have used smoothing buffers at the proxy to eliminate jitter and traffic burst effects. We have used prefix buffers at the proxy to cache the prefixes of popular videos to minimize the start-up delay and to enable near mean bit rate streaming from the server as well as from the proxy. Simulation results are presented to demonstrate the effectiveness of our streaming scheme.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicImage and Video Quality AssessmentFrench-language works237,207