Gadolinium‐free <i>T</i><sub>1</sub> contrast agents for MRI: Tunable pharmacokinetics of a new class of manganese porphyrins
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate a new class of manganese porphyrins with tunable pharmacokinetics as potential gadolinium (Gd)-free T1 agents for contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two new contrast agents, MnTCP and MnP2, were evaluated in four female rats. MRI was performed daily up to 3 days postinjection (0.05 mmol/kg) on a 3 T clinical scanner. T1 relaxation times and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI were performed to assess contrast enhancement and clearance in blood, heart, liver, kidney, and muscle. RESULTS: Relative T1 decreases were similar for MnTCP and Gd-DTPA in all tissues but were significantly larger (P < 0.05) for MnP2 in blood, heart, kidney, and liver (2-6-fold larger). Clearance of MnTCP was similar to Gd-DTPA, with T1 returning to baseline by 40 minutes and complete elimination in 1 day. MnP2 was cleared from blood after 2 days and sustained a lowered T1 in other tissues for at least 1 hour (P < 0.05). The maximum enhancement, slope, and time-to-peak were similar between contrast agents. Only the parameter AUC60 differed, with MnP2 yielding the largest AUC60 values primarily through longer retention in tissue. CONCLUSION: MnTCP and MnP2 offer distinct applications as Gd-free T1 contrast agents. MnTCP behaves like a Gd-DTPA analog, while MnP2 provides significantly greater and longer positive signal enhancement.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".