Environmental and genetic effects on crown shape in young loblolly pine plantations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Tree crown shape is an important trait affecting the light environment in forest canopies. We examined genetic and environmental effects on outer crown shape of young single-family stands of loblolly pine ( Pinus taeda L.). Crown diameter profiles were measured after canopy closure at four experimental sites in the southeastern US. The two examined families of contrasting aboveground productivity differed in crown length but not in their outer crown shapes or crown shape ratios, defined as the ratio of crown diameter to crown length. Within each site, intensive silvicultural treatment, consisting of fertilization and control of competing vegetation, had little effect upon crown shape. A strongly significant effect of site on crown shape parameters was found in the family grown at all four experimental sites; however, density differences among the experimental series likely accounted for a part of the across-sites variation in crown shape. In contrast to other studies on crown shape in trees, and to findings at age 2 years in the same stands, we conclude that family effects on the outer crown shape were small compared with the environmental effects in these 5-year-old pine plantations, following canopy closure.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".