A new association of congenital hydrocephalus, albinism, megalocornea, and retinal coloboma in a syndromic child: A clinical and genetic study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We describe a child with global developmental delay, prominent metopic suture, trigonocephaly, and cryptorchidism whose symptoms resemble the well-known 9p deletion syndrome or 9p monosomy. We also noted congenital hydrocephalus, oculocutaneous albinism, retinal coloboma, and megalocornea, which are not typical features of 9p monosomy. When a new albinism gene was localized to 9p (Chintamaneni et al., Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1991;178:227-235; Murty et al., Genomics 1992;13:227-229), we hypothesized that our patient had the 9p deletion syndrome plus albinism, with the deletion involving the albinism gene. We used FISH probes to test this hypothesis and found that the 9p region was normal, therefore excluding the 9p deletion syndrome. To our knowledge, the association of congenital hydrocephalus, albinism, megalocornea, and retinal coloboma has not been described in the literature. The purpose of this report is to describe this new association of congenital ocular and cerebral anomalies in a syndromic child.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".