MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2151084322

Perah oil: a potential substitute for omega-3 oils and its chemical properties

2013· article· en· W2151084322 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Nuraimi Azlan Hadi Tan, Bazlul Mobin Siddique, Ida Idayu Muhamad, Liza Md Salleh, Nor Diana Hassan

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Biotechnology for Wellness Industries · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicFatty Acid Research and Health
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSqualeneFourier transform infrared spectroscopyChemistryFood scienceDegree of unsaturationOrganic chemistryChemical engineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract: The perah seed oil is a potential source for high unsaturated and omega 3 oil. It can be an alternative choice for regular vegetable oil. The chemical and physical properties need to be investigated and evaluated for it to be used feasibly in the food industries and health care products. Modern day’s faster and sophisticated instruments and techniques are used to evaluate the physicochemical properties of edible or vegetable oils. This study includes FTIR spectroscopy GC-MS and GC to evaluate the chemical properties of it while colour was used to study the physical property. The peaks by FTIR were found at 3300-3000 cm -1 , 2960‐2850 cm -1 , 1760‐1670 cm -1 , 1650‐1580 cm -1 , and 1340‐1020 cm -1 . The GC-MS discover the potential beneficial compounds that available in extracted perah oil which are squalene, Vitamin E,and L.beta.-sitosterol. The GC data demonstrate about the free fatty acid profile which showed the high unsaturation in all oil samples extracted by different solvents. However, the colour measure for the visual suitable acceptability use for food or cosmetic application.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Biotechnology for Wellness IndustriesSame topicFatty Acid Research and HealthFrench-language works237,207