Threshold Al KLL Auger spectra of oxidized aluminium foils
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Threshold Al KLL Auger electron spectroscopy and K‐edge x‐ray absorption fine structure spectroscopy have been used to examine technical purity (99.5%) aluminium foil before and after chemical treatment that altered the thickness and degree of hydroxylation of the oxidized layer. Comprehensive surface chemical characterization was effected by means of monochromatized Al Kα‐excited photoelectron spectroscopy. Threshold Al KL 2, 3 L 2, 3 spectra were obtained for three of the foils investigated and these spectra were in broad agreement with those observed previously for pure Al foil. The relative intensities of the spectral components for two of the foils were clearly consistent with the previously proposed assignment of the resonantly enhanced Auger component, situated between those arising from the metal and Al(III) oxide, to a thin interfacial layer. The threshold Auger spectra from the aluminium foil bearing the thickest and most hydroxylated oxidized layer were not obviously consistent with the interfacial layer model but O K‐edge spectra revealed that this surface layer was fundamentally different from the others and could have had a greater interfacial surface area. Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".