MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2151114508 · doi:10.2113/gscanmin.45.3.471

THE CRYSTAL STRUCTURES OF X(NpO2)(PO4)(H2O)3 (X = K+, Na+, Rb+, NH4+) AND THEIR RELATIONSHIP TO THE AUTUNITE GROUP

2007· article· en· W2151114508 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Tori Z. Forbes, Peter C. Burns

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Mineralogist · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicRadioactive element chemistry and processing
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGroup (periodic table)CrystallographyChemistryCrystal structureMaterials scienceOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Four Np 6+ phosphates with compositions X (NpO 2 )(PO 4 )(H 2 O) 3 , X = K + , Na + , Rb + , NH 4 + , have been synthesized by mild hydrothermal methods, and their structures have been determined. Single-crystal X-ray-diffraction data were collected using Mo K α radiation and an APEX CCD detector. The Np 6+ structures containing K + , Na + , Rb + , and NH 4 + ( KP1 , NaP1 , RbP1 , NH 4 P1 ) were refined to agreement indices R 1 0.042, 0.051, 0.066, and 0.023 calculated for 831, 856, 798, and 857 unique observed reflections, respectively. KP1 crystallizes in space group P 4/ ncc , with a 6.9564(8), c 17.826(4) A, V 862.6(2) A 3 , Z = 4. NaP1 also is tetragonal, P 4/ ncc , with a 7.005(1), c 16.986(4) A, V 833.6(3) A 3 , Z = 4. RbP1 is tetragonal, P 4/ ncc , with a 7.031(4), c 17.87(2) A, V 884(1) A 3 , Z = 4. NH 4 P1 crystallizes in space group P 4/ ncc with a 6.9843(6), c 18.023(3) A, V 879.2(2) A 3 , Z = 4. Each of these structures contains sheets of composition [(NpO 2 )(PO 4 )] − consisting of Np 6+ in square bipyramidal coordination and phosphate tetrahedra. These sheets are topologically identical to the well-known uranyl phosphate sheets of the autunite group. The monovalent cations and H 2 O group are located in the interlayer, where they balance the charge on the sheets and provide linkages between the sheets.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.710
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian MineralogistSame topicRadioactive element chemistry and processingFrench-language works237,207