Gouverner une AMP, une affaire publique ? Exemples Sud-Méditerranéens
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans le contexte du millennium ecosystem assessment (2001-2005), les institutions multilatérales, les groupes de pression internationaux et les Etats ont promu les Aires Marines Protégées (AMP) comme instrument majeur de la conservation de la biodiversité marine. Or, rares sont les AMP dans le monde à atteindre leurs objectifs. En recourant à une analyse de la gouvernance des AMP en Méditerranée Sud (Algérie et Tunisie), la pertinence des plans de gestion à l’égard des objectifs de conservation et de développement durable est appréciée. La difficile intégration des objectifs de conservation et des objectifs de développement, suppose une meilleure connaissance des enjeux socio-économiques locaux et une adaptation des modes de gouvernance des AMP vers une implication accrue des usagers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".