MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2151145814 · doi:10.1098/rspa.2009.0650

Map dynamics versus dynamics of associated delay reaction–diffusion equations with a Neumann condition

2010· article· en· W2151145814 on OpenAlexaff
Taishan Yi, Xingfu Zou

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology Models
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsMathematical analysisReaction–diffusion systemNeumann boundary conditionCounterexampleScalar (mathematics)Nonlinear systemVon Neumann architectureStability (learning theory)Heat equationDynamical systems theoryBoundary value problemApplied mathematicsComputer sciencePure mathematicsGeometryPhysicsDiscrete mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In this paper, we consider a class of delay reaction–diffusion equations (DRDEs) with a parameter ε>0. A homogeneous Neumann boundary condition and non-negative initial functions are posed to the equation. By letting , such an equation is formally reduced to a scalar difference equation (or map dynamical system). The main concern is the relation of the absolute (or delay-independent) global stability of a steady state of the equation and the dynamics of the nonlinear map in the equation. By employing the idea of attracting intervals for solution semiflows of the DRDEs, we prove that the globally stable dynamics of the map indeed ensures the delay-independent global stability of a constant steady state of the DRDEs. We also give a counterexample to show that the delay-independent global stability of DRDEs cannot guarantee the globally stable dynamics of the map. Finally, we apply the abstract results to the diffusive delay Nicholson blowfly equation and the diffusive Mackey–Glass haematopoiesis equation. The resulting criteria for both model equations are amazingly simple and are optimal in some sense (although there is no existing result to compare with for the latter).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.870
Threshold uncertainty score0.377

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations37
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering SciencesSame topicMathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology ModelsFrench-language works237,207