Finite element modeling of electromagnetic signal propagation in a phantom arm
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Improving the control of artificial arms remains a considerable challenge. It may be possible to graft remaining peripheral nerves in an amputated limb to spare muscles in or near the residual limb and use these nerve-muscle grafts as additional myoelectric control signals. This would allow simultaneous control of multiple, degrees of freedom (DOF) and could greatly improve the control of artificial limbs. For this technique to be successful, the electromyography (EMG) signals from the nerve-muscle grafts would need to be independent of each other with minimal crosstalk. To study EMG signal propagation and quantify crosstalk, finite element (FE) models were developed in a phantom-arm model. The models were validated with experimental data collected by applying sinusoidal excitations to a phantom-arm model and recording the surface electric potential distribution. There was a very high correlation (r > 0.99) between the FEM data and the experimental data, with the error in signal magnitude generally less than 5%. Simulations were then performed using muscle dielectric properties with static, complex, and full electromagnetic solvers. The results indicate that significant displacement currents can develop (> 50% of total current) and that the fall-off of surface signal power varies with how the signal source is modeled. Index Terms-Control, electromyography (EMG), finite element (FE), modeling, prosthesis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".