Efficient Network Protection Design Models using Pre-Cross-Connected Trails
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Network survivability is a key design issue for optical transport mesh networks. Various survivability schemes have been introduced among which p-cycle has (and continues) attracted quite a lot of attention because of its fast and efficient protection capabilities. The concept of p-cycle has been generalized to pre-cross-connected trails, or p-trails, by exploiting the fact that providing pre-cross-connected protection paths and obtaining fast restoration do not necessarily require a cyclic structure as in p-cycles. In this paper, we investigate the benefits and sharing capabilities of p-trails and observe that non-simple p-trails and p-cycles can be built from merging simple trails. We derive two ILP models for survivable network design using p-trails. Our first design model is a simple ILP whose optimal solution relies on the exhaustive enumeration of all simple trails in the network. We observe that the size of our ILP model, and therefore the computation time, become prohibitively large making the model unpractical for larger network instances. Therefore, to overcome this scalability issue, we develop an enhanced model for this complex optimization problem using the column generation (CG) decomposition technique. Our developed design approach is shown to be very scalable, as opposed to other prior p-trail design methods; further, we show that p-trails are more efficient than p-cycles in terms of protection resource redundancy in the network.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".