Efficient Network Protection Design Models using Pre-Cross-Connected Trails
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Network survivability is a key design issue for optical transport mesh networks. Various survivability schemes have been introduced among which p-cycle has (and continues) attracted quite a lot of attention because of its fast and efficient protection capabilities. The concept of p-cycle has been generalized to pre-cross-connected trails, or p-trails, by exploiting the fact that providing pre-cross-connected protection paths and obtaining fast restoration do not necessarily require a cyclic structure as in p-cycles. In this paper, we investigate the benefits and sharing capabilities of p-trails and observe that non-simple p-trails and p-cycles can be built from merging simple trails. We derive two ILP models for survivable network design using p-trails. Our first design model is a simple ILP whose optimal solution relies on the exhaustive enumeration of all simple trails in the network. We observe that the size of our ILP model, and therefore the computation time, become prohibitively large making the model unpractical for larger network instances. Therefore, to overcome this scalability issue, we develop an enhanced model for this complex optimization problem using the column generation (CG) decomposition technique. Our developed design approach is shown to be very scalable, as opposed to other prior p-trail design methods; further, we show that p-trails are more efficient than p-cycles in terms of protection resource redundancy in the network.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it