Les enjeux organisationnels de la participation communautaire dans un contexte de modernisation réflexive
Bibliographic record
Abstract
À l’aide des propos théoriques apportés par Giddens (1994) et Beck (2001) sur la modernisation réflexive, cet article explore les transformations expansionnistes inhérentes à la mondialisation institutionnelle des sociétés modernes et leur influence sur l’intégration organisationnelle de la participation des communautés locales aux décisions d’intérêt collectif concernant la santé des populations. La complexité et la diversité culturelle des conseils locaux de santé (CLS) mis en place lors des stratégies de décentralisation du « Sistema Único de Saúde » (SUS) au Brésil nous serviront d’appui pour illustrer les enjeux qui découlent de la confluence des lignes de tensions paradoxales inhérentes à ce processus d’intégration organisationnelle de la participation communautaire. Ces forces divergentes, mais potentiellement complémentaires, constituent un élément clé du renouvellement démocratique des pratiques participatives dans le champ complexe de la santé publique.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".