A possible physical meaning of Case damping in pile dynamics
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents some possible interpretations of the physical meaning of the lumped, toe, and skin Case damping factors, jcL, jct, and jcs, respectively, which are extensively utilized in the dynamic analysis of pile driveability and capacity. A single degree of freedom model is employed to relate the Case damping to the hysteretic damping ratios of soil and pile materials. This relation and the damping ratios of soils and piles show that the Case damping factors for piles in sandy and clayey soils may overlap at all strain magnitudes. Coupling of pile toe and skin resistance is analyzed, and the jcLfactor is found to be a function of the skin and toe resistance ratio of the pile. Consequently, the jcLfactor is an important indicator with which the skin friction and toe resistance of piles can be separated. A database of 133 cases of dynamic pile tests in Florida has been used to substantiate the analyses and interpretations. The effects of the assumptions made in this paper are also discussed.Key words: pile dynamics, wave equation, Case damping, hysteretic damping, bearing capacity, skin friction.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".