Ant colony-based many-to-one sensory data routing in Wireless Sensor Networks
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An ant colony-based routing protocol is presented in this paper that is specifically designed to route many-to-one sensory data in a multi-hop Wireless Sensor Network (WSN). Because a many-to-one routing paradigm generates lots of traffic in a multi-hop WSN resulting in greater energy wastage, higher end-to-end delay and packet loss, the proposed routing protocol also comes with a lightweight congestion control mechanism, which is capable of handling both event-based and periodic upstream sensory data flow to the base station. The proposed protocol works in two-phases. During the first phase, the protocol uses ant-based intelligence to find and enforce the shortest path and in the second phase, when the actual many-to-one sensory data transmission takes place, the protocol combines the knowledge gained during the first phase with the congestion control mechanism to avoid packet loss and traffic while routing the sensory data. When compared with the related algorithms, the proposed algorithm shows promising results.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it