MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2151312691 · doi:10.1109/jlt.2011.2165527

Fiber Optic Distributed Differential Displacement Sensor

2011· article· en· W2151312691 on OpenAlexaff
Michael T. V. Wylie, Bruce G. Colpitts, Anthony W. Brown

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Lightwave Technology · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Fiber Optic Sensors
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOptical fiberFiber optic sensorDisplacement (psychology)OpticsMaterials sciencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A Fiber Optic Distributed Differential Displacement Sensor (FODDDS) that is temperature insensitive is modelled and experimentally verified to determine shape. Created using a steel tape, 9/125 μm single-mode fiber, and adhesive, the FODDDS can be used to determine the shape or displacement of any object to which it is attached. The sensitivity of the FODDDS, for the substrate thickness used in this experiment, is specified as a maximum measurable radius of curvature of 103 m. The error of the sensor is examined and the sources of this error are examined. The FODDDS is designed around a Brillouin Optical Time-Domain Analysis system, but is compatible with both correlation and frequency domain based systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.151
Threshold uncertainty score0.691

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Lightwave TechnologySame topicAdvanced Fiber Optic SensorsFrench-language works237,207