À propos d’une recherche-action-formation en alphabétisation populaire
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article expose la dynamique vécue entre chercheuses, formatrices et jeunes analphabètes dans une recherche-action-formation autour de l’appropriation de l’écrit. Ces jeunes ont comme caractéristiques essentielles le fait d’être sortis du système scolaire en ayant peu ou mal acquis les savoirs premiers pour des raisons sociales, familiales ou fonctionnelles. Au moyen de l’approche autobiographique servant comme base méthodologique, chacun, en tant que sujet-acteur, a reconstruit et partagé son récit de formation à l’écrit. Ainsi, un processus d’action commune, de coformation et de corecherche a été vécu. Au regard du rapport théorie/pratique en formation des adultes, la contribution relatée repose sur une dynamique de positionnement des sujets-acteurs face aux finalités de recherche et de formation articulées au renouvellement des pratiques d’alphabétisation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.021 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".