MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2151321029 · doi:10.1109/icc.2004.1313055

A new MAP channel decoder trellis path metric for a CDMA mobile subject to channel estimation errors

2004· article· en· W2151321029 on OpenAlexaff
Geoffrey G. Messier, Witold A. Krzymień

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Communication Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaNortel (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTrellis (graph)Rake receiverMetric (unit)AlgorithmComputer scienceChannel (broadcasting)Code division multiple accessTurbo codeDecoding methodsMathematicsFadingElectronic engineeringTelecommunicationsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new trellis path metric is derived for the CDMA mobile MAP and logMAP turbo decoders. This metric accounts for the non-Gaussian received symbol probability distribution seen at the output of a mobile RAKE receiver when the RAKE combining weights are subject to channel estimation error. Since an exact analytical expression for this distribution is difficult to find, the metric is instead derived by finding the characteristic function of an approximation to the distribution. Simulations are then used to compare how the CDMA forward link performs when the mobile uses either the conventional logMAP trellis path metric or the new metric. The results indicate that while the conventional metric is still the best choice when channel estimation error is small, the new metric provides a significant performance improvement when channel estimation error is large.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Wireless Communication TechniquesFrench-language works237,207