MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2151321526 · doi:10.1049/iet-map.2013.0564

60 GHz optically transparent microstrip antenna made of meshed AuGL material

2014· article· en· W2151321526 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIET Microwaves Antennas & Propagation · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAntenna Design and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec en Abitibi-TémiscamingueCommunications Research Centre CanadaUniversité du Québec en Outaouais
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceMicrostrip antennaMicrostripOptoelectronicsOpticsAntenna (radio)EngineeringPhysicsElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this study, a 60 GHz optically transparent microstrip (OTM) patch antenna array is designed, fabricated and measured. Gold meshes are implemented for the two layers of the antenna. A numerical parametric study on the positioning of the two meshed layers is performed to give design considerations and optimise both the electromagnetic and optical performances of OTM antennas at 60 GHz band. The simulation and measured results of the OTM antenna with a theoretical maximum transparency up to 74.6% are compared with a light reflecting reference antenna. Both antennas have similar reflection coefficients and radiating performances. This study provides practical design rules to fabricate high gain OTM antennas with performances similar to those of standard topologies at 60 GHz band, with the addition of high optical transparency.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.332
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it