La responsabilisation du patient dans un contexte de télésoins à domicile
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Sommaire: La volonté de transformation du système de santé est propice à une recrudescence du discours public sur la responsabilisation du patient. Les technologies d'information et de communication ( tic ) sont régulièrement envisagées comme moyens pouvant permettre au patient d'exercer un rôle accru dans la prise en charge des questions de santé. Ce texte vise à cerner le sens de la responsabilisation dans un contexte de télésoins à domicile. L‘étude d'un service de suivi à domicile met en lumière l'un des quatre paradigmes d'interprétation de la responsabilisation du patient: le paradigme professionnel qui est orienté vers l'habilitation en matière de santé. Par une double lecture représentant les approches sociologique et psychologique, cette étude montre les possibilités et les limites d'une technologie de télésoins à domicile par rapport à six principales variables: accès aux connaissances; développement d'une réflexion argumentée; influence sur l'action ou la décision; compétence perçue; contrôle perçu; et intériorisation des buts. Les résultats permettent d'observer le haut niveau d'exigence que représenterait une initiative visant l’émergence de patients informés et compétents. Surtout des patients “experts” dans une vision de la responsabilisation fondée sur la reconnaissance du caractère holistique des connaissances, du principe d'autonomie de pensée et du potentiel d'influence du patient sur une variété de décisions. En conclusion, sont précisées les implications qu'ont ces résultats sur la gestion du système public de santé. Abstract: The willingness to transform the health care system is conducive to a new wave of public discourse on patient empowerment. Information and communications technologies ( ict ) are regularly considered as means that allow the patient to exercise increased control in addressing health issues. This text aims at examining this phenomenon within the tele‐homecare context. The study of a follow‐up home‐care service highlights one of the four paradigms of the interpretation of patient empowerment: the professional paradigm that is health empowerment‐oriented. By using both a sociological and a psychological approach, the study identifies the possibilities and limitations of tele‐homecare technology, based on six major variables: access to knowledge, development of critical thinking, personal impact on action or decision, perceived competency, perceived control, and internalization of goals. The results show the high level of requirements needed for an initiative that would produce informed, competent and, most importantly, “expert” patients according to a vision of empowerment based on the recognition of the holistic nature of knowledge, the principle of autonomous thinking, and the patient's potential impact on a variety of decisions. In conclusion, the article defines the implications of these results in terms of the management of the public health system.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.016 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.016 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.009 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".