EFFECT OF ENHANCED FLUORESCENT LIGHT ON ACCEPTABILITY OF MEAT CUTS
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT The effects of incandescent (INC) and two enhanced fluorescent lights: high‐spectrum (FL‐Hi Spec) and Chroma 50 (FL‐Chroma 50) on the appearance of fresh pork, chicken and beef meat were investigated. The color of all meats was more desirable ( P < 0.05) when presented under INC and FL‐Hi Spec lights. The color used to describe pork meat presented under these two lights was mainly pink, but was more brown under FL‐Chroma 50. Relative luminance data, collected with a fiber optic probe connected to a photo diode array, demonstrated the reason for the lower amount of red in the FL‐Chroma 50 light source. The differences among the lights were more pronounced in the lighter pork and chicken cuts than in the darker beef cuts.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it